Hello
My company is currently in the final stages of selecting a SCC system. It has come down to Sourcegear, and Perforce. From my perspective as the IT guy, there are so many reasons to choose Sourcegear, and I have made this clear to everyone involved. However, the software manager's people have to use it, and their primary dev environment is Codewarrior. Perforce has a Codewarrior Plug-in. So, he is pushing for Perforce, and winning. And I just hate that package.
I know there is an IDE available, but there is no way anybody here will have time to develop a plug-in. SG sounds like it's compatible with standard SCC VSS interface, but Metrowerks does not appear to use that.
Does anyone know where I can get a Codewarrior plug-in for Vault, or some way to make CW work with Vault as-is?
If we can find any way to get Vault integrated to the CW IDE, it would be a guaranteed sale for Sourcegear. The software guys' only reason for choosing P4 is the CW plugin. If that goes away, SG wins, and so do we.
I would appreciate any ideas or suggestions here! We have a meeting on friday to make the final decision. I really hope I can find some way to veto Perforce and do everyone a big favor by implementing SG Vault.
Thanks
Metrowerks Codewarrior plug-in?
Moderator: SourceGear
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 2:54 pm
- Location: Concord, Ontario, Canada
- Contact:
Darn. I wish we could help. Unfortunately, there is no CodeWarrior plugin for Vault. I would be lying if I said there will be one anytime soon.
Deep down inside, Perforce is a fine product. You'll get used to it eventually. If you ever need to just vent your frustrations, we'll be here for you.
Deep down inside, Perforce is a fine product. You'll get used to it eventually. If you ever need to just vent your frustrations, we'll be here for you.
Eric Sink
Software Craftsman
SourceGear
Software Craftsman
SourceGear
Has this changed?
Is there any change in this? We would really like a CodeWarrior plugin also. I figured I would ask as this has been over a year since you answered this.