Server-side storage of preferences?
Moderator: SourceGear
Server-side storage of preferences?
We have a developer who keeps losing all of his preferences. Most annoyingly, his client keeps going back to Check out everything Exclusively mode.
I don't know what is causing this, and fixing it would be nice, but even better would be to store preferences on the server and even allow those preferences to be shared/enforced amongst all developers instead of letting everyone make their own choice.
I don't know what is causing this, and fixing it would be nice, but even better would be to store preferences on the server and even allow those preferences to be shared/enforced amongst all developers instead of letting everyone make their own choice.
.cs files, project files. The problem is not whether we have them set as mergeable or not. I can check these types of files out fine. And so can he. It's just that periodically I notice that he has them exclusively, and he goes into his Vault settings and notices that the Always Request Exclusive locks option has reverted to its default value.
He has also noticed that dialogs that he has silenced periodically start showing up again. It just looks like his settings get lost from time to time.
He has also noticed that dialogs that he has silenced periodically start showing up again. It just looks like his settings get lost from time to time.
Vault 5.0, Visual Studio 2010, Enhanced Client
Why I asked so much about the exclusive checkouts is that particular item is affected by other settings or how files check out is affected by other factors.
Could you give me a list of several items beside exclusive checkouts that seem to get lost?
Some settings are stored in the Vault database and some in the user's registry. I need to pinpoint which set of settings are affected.
Could you give me a list of several items beside exclusive checkouts that seem to get lost?
Some settings are stored in the Vault database and some in the user's registry. I need to pinpoint which set of settings are affected.