Cruise Control and Draconet and Vault Version 3.0.7.2863

If you are having a problem using Vault, post a message here.

Moderator: SourceGear

jclausius
Posts: 3706
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2003 1:17 pm
Location: SourceGear
Contact:

Post by jclausius » Thu Dec 01, 2005 5:15 pm

Since you are using Vault 3.0.x, have you thought about upgrading your Vault server to Vault 3.1.5* ?

These types of concurrency issues were addressed in the 3.1.x Servers.


If you do decide to upgrade, please make sure you have a verified valid SQL Server backup in case you run into any upgrade issues. Also, the 3.1.x upgrade makes some changes to the internal database schema, so the upgrade time is dependent on repository makeup as well as the server's hardware.



* - Vault 3.1.6 is just around the corner.
Jeff Clausius
SourceGear

bryanandrews
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by bryanandrews » Thu Dec 01, 2005 7:50 pm

So this is normal what we are seeing?

jclausius
Posts: 3706
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2003 1:17 pm
Location: SourceGear
Contact:

Post by jclausius » Fri Dec 02, 2005 8:40 am

Just to clarify, my post referred to the Server deadlock/rollback log entries. The conditions that lead to log entries of this type have been addressed in the Vault 3.1.x server.

Without more information, I cannot say those log entries are related to the CC.Net / Draco.Net issues.
Jeff Clausius
SourceGear

bryanandrews
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by bryanandrews » Fri Dec 02, 2005 8:44 am

I can say for (pretty much) certain that those entries are probably what is causing the issue for us.

ian_sg
Posts: 787
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 10:55 am
Location: SourceGear
Contact:

Post by ian_sg » Fri Dec 02, 2005 8:50 am

Because CC.NET (and probably Draco.NET) kick off history queries for all your projects immediately when you start it, it is possible to have concurrency-related issues, particularly if you're running a 3.0.x version of Vault. I agree with Jeff that you're likely to fix the problem by upgrading to 3.1.5.
Ian Olsen
SourceGear

bryanandrews
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:25 pm

Post by bryanandrews » Fri Dec 02, 2005 8:53 am

What kind of upgrade is this? Pretty painless or task intensive?

jclausius
Posts: 3706
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2003 1:17 pm
Location: SourceGear
Contact:

Post by jclausius » Fri Dec 02, 2005 9:04 am

The upgrade is free for all Vault 3.0.x.

The answer to your other question is "it depends". The schema change is significant, and will be hardware dependent. For example, we've had 20-50GB databases take 45 minutes on decent hardware. The same database on 4 yr old hardware took > 15 hours.

I posted some tips in a previous post http://support.sourcegear.com/viewtopic ... t=15#20443
Jeff Clausius
SourceGear

Post Reply